The discussion focus on 30th Oct 2013 is around representation, definition and mobilisation. Here follows a list of questions which Kooj is using as starting points:
– to what extent do or should the arts practices under a ‘refugee’ umbrella represent a distinct sector, what are its identifying characteristics and what can this achieve?
– what are the limitations or problems with such initiatives?
– how does such work support and progress wider discussions around support for refugees and human rights?
– the way people seeking refuge are treated continues to move towards tighter restrictions, reduced sympathy and rights, greater destitution, racism and xenophobia. Is art at its limit in being able to influence such developments, or does our game need to change?
– what kind of a sector is it or should it become – a loose movement or an organised set of voices?
– is there a challenge to established modes of practice that such work presents, and in what ways?
– what kinds of practice might be of particular importance in developing such a sector?
– presentation of arts works in relation to refugees can often label themselves and dig their own corner of predictable narratives and styles – which in turn can stereotype themselves. In what ways can arts practices avoid such predictability?
If anyone has any responses to these, feel free to add your comments by clicking on ‘reply’.
